New Zealand Cricket is "very
excited" about the prospect of playing a day-night Test
on their tour of Australia in late 2015, after Cricket Australia announced
plans to trial floodlit long-form cricket in the Sheffield Shield this summer.
The Australian Cricketers' Association said that while it needed to be convinced
on several aspects, particularly the durability of the pink ball, it was
approaching the issue with an "open mind".
The potential to attract a much
larger television viewership in the evening by roping in audiences in India and
other big markets was of chief interest to
NZC, according to chief executive Devid
White "'We are very interested in
the concept,"' White was quoted as saying in the Sydney Morning Herald.
"'I don't think anyone is trying to make out that this is going to replace
Test cricket as we know it. From a New Zealand Cricket perspective, if it's
successful we would maybe play one game a series. It will give people an
opportunity to watch the game after work or after school, at the game and on
the television, so that's got commercial possibilities.
"'Our time zone with the
northern hemisphere and India is not the most advantageous at the moment. By
playing at night it opens up a lot more opportunity from an international
broadcast point of view in terms of a better time zone. So there are strong,
strong commercial opportunities there for us.'"
While the administrators are enticed
by the promise of enhanced revenues, ACA chief executive Paul marsh sounded
caution, saying players weren't entirely convinced yet and would not want the
"integrity of the game" to be compromised.
"At the moment the support from
the players is divided. It's roughly 50-50 in terms of players who think
day-night Test cricket should be pursued and that has moved towards more
support over time,'' Marsh said. ''Our view on any playing condition has always
been that it must be trialled at domestic level before it gets to international
level and I'm glad they are going down that path.
"In saying that, we are
sceptical about the ability of the ball to stand up and that's been the
problem… you don't want, by going down this path, to lose the integrity of the
game and if you have a ball that is not going to stand up for 80 overs, then I
think you have to look at it and say it can't be taken to Test level.
''We're going into this with an open
mind but there are issues we believe exist and we would need to be convinced
they can be overcome… if all goes well, it is something that could
happen."
No comments:
Post a Comment